It may strike
you as odd that so much of the imagery associated with Valentine’s Day ever
since Chaucer made it symbolic of match making in his poem The Parlement of
Foules (see yesterday’s post about that here), are the persistent references to
spring-like things such as flowers in bloom and birds in mating mode. How’s
this? In February? England is, after all, in the northern latitudes.
The Huth Hours calendar, ca 1480, showing saints days for February |
The very idea
was so incongruous to one scholar, Henry Ansgar Kelly, the director of UCLA’s
Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, that he makes the argument that
Chaucer must really have been thinking of another St. Valentine, that of Genoa,
whose day is observed on May 3. His reasoning is summarized in this tidbit fromUCLA’s website, but
it’s based on assumptions and leaps of logic that have caused it to be roundly
discredited by more careful scholars. (Also briefly addressed by Wikipedia's article onValentine’s Day.)
In her rather
scathing review of the Kelly treatise, Phillipa Hardman of the University of Reading
(see source below) points out that, among other things, Kelly is disregarding
the calendar shift that had taken place by Chaucer’s time, got the date for St.
Valentine of Genoa wrong (it’s May 2, not May 3), and is making other assumptions about the
significance of May 3 that “do not bear examination.”
I might add
that it would appear that Kelly is assuming that Chaucer, who was a clerk at the Palace of Westminster, was more familiar with the Italian calendar, where the Genoese St. Valentine
would have been honored — influenced by a trip to Italy eight years earlier—than
by the English calendar, which would have had February 14 designated as St.
Valentine’s Day.
About that
calendar shift: In Chaucer’s time, England and all of Europe were still using
the Julian calendar, which was off by one day for every 128 years from the
natural year. Because of that, Chaucer’s February 14 was equivalent to
our February 23. Pope Gregory reformed the calendar by papal edict in 1582 by
eliminating 10 days, so that October 4, 1582, was followed by October 15, 1582,
correcting the accumulated error in one massive leap. (From Duncan, see sources
below.)
So now we
have the Renaissance Valentine’s Day edged a little closer to March, but is
that enough to explain birds in mating mode? Was Chaucer stretching his poetic
license a bit too far by stating that birds “choose their mates” on Valentine’s
Day? That’s the topic for tomorrow's post.
• • • • • • •
Selected Sources Not Linked in the
Text
Duncan,
David Ewing. Calendar: Humanity’s Epic
Struggle to Determine a True and Accurate Year. Avon Books, 1998.
Hardman,
Phillipa. “Chaucer and the Cult of Saint Valentine by Henry Ansgar Kelly. ...” (a
book review) The Yearbook of English Studies, Vol. 20 (1990), pp. 236-237. (Accessed
from JSTOR database via Hennepin County Library.)
Oruch,
Jack. B. "St. Valentine, Chaucer, and Spring in February." Speculum,
Vol. 56, No. 3 (July 1981), pp. 534–565. (Accessed from JSTOR database via
Hennepin County Library.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for reading, and for sharing your thoughts.